Rs. Perlstein et al., SYSTEMICALLY ADMINISTERED HISTAMINE H-1 AND H-2-RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS DO NOT BLOCK THE ACTH RESPONSE TO BACTERIAL LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE AND INTERLEUKIN-1, Neuroendocrinology, 60(4), 1994, pp. 418-425
The administration of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) results in the activati
on of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPAA). We recently repo
rted that the participation and interaction of LPS-induced proinflamma
tory cytokines were obligatory for the stimulation of adrenocorticotro
pic hormone (ACTH) release by LPS. LPS and LPS-derived cytokines also
stimulate the release of histamine (HA). HA is a known hypothalamic ne
urotransmitter and activates the HPAA. Therefore, to elucidate the rol
e of HA in LPS- and cytokine-induced ACTH release, we evaluated the ef
fects of several HA H-1 and H-2 receptor antagonists on the ACTH respo
nse to LPS, recombinant human interleukin-1 alpha (rhIL-1 alpha) and H
A in mice. Although all 3 of the H-1 receptor antagonists administered
(mepyramine (MEP), diphenhydramine (DPH) or promethazine (PMZ)) were
able to block the 10-min ACTH response to HA, only PMZ (a less selecti
ve H-1 receptor antagonist than MEP) was able to reduce the LPS- or rh
IL-1 alpha-induced ACTH responses. Ranitidine, a powerful and selectiv
e H-2 receptor antagonist, had little effect on the LPS- and rhIL-1 al
pha-induced ACTH responses, while metiamide (MET), a much less potent
first-generation H-2 receptor antagonist, substantially diminished ACT
H release. The greater effectiveness of PMZ, in contrast to MEP or DPH
, probably relates to the ability of phenothiazine derivatives to inhi
bit non-HA-dependent pathways involved in the stimulation of the HPAA
by cytokines; the same may be true of MET. Our results suggest that, i
n contrast to the essential role of HA in the activation of the HPAA b
y noninflammatory stressors, the stimulation of ACTH release by LPS an
d rhIL-1 alpha is not as dependent on the participation of either the
H-1 or the H-2 receptor.