THE EFFICACY OF CERVICAL EXTENSION-COMPRESSION TRACTION COMBINED WITHDIVERSIFIED MANIPULATION AND DROP TABLE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE REHABILITATION OF CERVICAL LORDOSIS - A PILOT-STUDY
Dd. Harrison et al., THE EFFICACY OF CERVICAL EXTENSION-COMPRESSION TRACTION COMBINED WITHDIVERSIFIED MANIPULATION AND DROP TABLE ADJUSTMENTS IN THE REHABILITATION OF CERVICAL LORDOSIS - A PILOT-STUDY, Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics, 17(7), 1994, pp. 454-464
Objective: To experimentally investigate the effect of cervical extens
ion-compression traction combined with diversified chiropractic manipu
lation and drop table adjusting in establishing or increasing cervical
lordosis. Design: Blinded, before and after trial with pre- and postl
ateral cervical radiographic measurement. Setting: Primary care privat
e chiropractic clinic in Saugus, MA. Subjects: A) Control group-conven
ience sample who had no health care for 10-14 wk, 30 persons. B) Treat
ment group 1, nonrandomized control trial, 35 persons, whose pre- and
postlateral cervical radiographs were taken 10-14 wk apart and whose r
adiographs clearly depicted C1 through C7. C) Treatment group 2, nonra
ndomized control trial, 30 persons, whose pre- and postlateral cervica
l radiographs were taken 10-14 wk apart and whose radiographs clearly
depicted C1 through C7. Interventions: Treatment group 1: diversified
spinal manipulation, drop table adjustments and cervical extension-com
pression traction five times per week for 10-14 wk (12 wk +/- 2). Trea
tment group 2: diversified spinal manipulation and drop table adjustme
nts five times per week for 10-14 wk (12 wk +/- 2). Main Outcome Measu
res: Anterior head translation millimeters, C2 to C7 absolute rotation
angle, angle of C1 to horizontal (atlas plane angle), five relative r
otation angles (C2-3, C3-4, C4-5, C5-6, C6-7) and qualitative classifi
cation of lordotic configuration. Results: No statistically significan
t changes existed between the pre- and posttests for the control group
except in the C6-7 relative rotation angle. In the treatment group 1,
statistically significant differences were found in all X-ray marking
s. Twenty-nine of 35 members have a lordosis after treatment compared
to 11 of 35 before treatment. The C2 to C7 angle changed an average 13
.2-degrees, C1 to horizontal changed an average 9.8-degrees, the anter
ior head translation reduced an average of 6.8 mm, the average relativ
e rotation angle changed: C2-3: 3.1, C3-4: 5.5, C4-5: 4.80, C5-6: 2.7
and C6-7: 1.1. In the treatment group 2, no statistically significant
changes existed between the pre- and posttests except atlas angulation
to horizontal which increased an average of 3.0-degrees. Conclusions:
A transformation to a lordotic configuration or increase in lordotic
configuration occurred and was measured in the majority of treatment g
roup 1 subjects, while no change in the control group and essentially
no change in treatment group 2 was measured. Extension-compression tra
ction combined with diversified chiropractic manipulation and drop tab
le adjusting procedures may improve or partially reestablish the cervi
cal lordosis in 10-14 wk of daily care.