Site index is difficult to implement and interpret in multispecies, mu
ltiple-aged stands, and its relationship to site factors is obscure. U
sing data from the USDA forest inventory and analysis (FIA) for the La
ke States, we developed log-log relationships between mean tree size a
nd stand density for five cover types. Fits were good, with r2 from 0.
96 to 0.98 and slopes from -0.948 to -0.995. We define an alternative
index of site quality, the relative stocking index (RSI), as the ratio
of a stand's measured density to that predicted using the log-log rel
ationship for its cover type (the norm). We divided the range of RSI i
nto three classes for each type (<0.9 of norm, >0.91 but <1.1 of norm,
and >1.1 of norm). Based on analyses of the 1977 and 1990 FIA data fr
om Minnesota, class assignments for individual stands remained constan
t over that 13-year period. Relationships between site factors and eit
her RSI classes or analogous classes based on site index were examined
in a subset of 169 stands. Temperature, precipitation, silt content o
f surface soil, and calculated annual water deficit all differed signi
ficantly among RSI classes, but not among site-index classes. The RSI
is easy to apply, robust (resistant to change), and related to site fa
ctors. It merits additional examination as an index of site quality, e
specially in heterogenous stands.