This paper is put up for discussion to help Knowledge Organization fin
d its proper place. To begin with, a few basic concepts from the field
of communication theory are defined. The new concepts permit the conc
lusion that what we are facing at present is not a flood of informatio
n but one of messages, and that this latter flood must not be equated
indiscriminately with a knowledge flood. Messages must be judged on th
eir contents. To this end, 'knowledge' is subdivided into 'core-', 'pe
ripheral', and 'pseudo-knowledge', and it is argued that the great maj
ority of scientific publications contains peripheral and pseudoknowled
ge. With the aid of two interlocking and self-amplifying recursive mec
hanisms it is shown that and how pseudoknowledge is more and more gain
ing ground, particularly outside the mathematical and scientific disci
plines, hence precisely in those fields which deal with social problem
s in the broadest sense of the word. Thus a deficit of knowledge on wh
ich to base action is produced, leading to a general disorientation -
a modern form of ignorance, keenly manifesting itself at present in a
crisis of leadership. The research tasks resulting from the above for
Knowledge Organization are roughly outlined.