In the behavioral literature on human movement, a distinction is made
between the learning of parameters and the learning of new movement fo
rms or topologies. Whereas the target articles by Thach, Smith, and Ho
uk et al. provide evidence for cerebellar involvement in parametrizati
on learning and adaptation, the evidence in favor of its involvement i
n the generation of new movement patterns is less straightforward. A c
ase is made for focusing more attention on the latter issue in the fut
ure. This would directly help to bridge the gap between current neurop
hysiological approaches to the role of the cerebellum and the behavior
al expressions of human motor learning.