Several themes can be identified in the commentaries. The first is tha
t the climbing fibers may have more than one function; the second is t
hat the climbing fibers provide sensory rather than motor signals. We
accept the possibility that climbing fibers may have more than one fun
ction - hence ''consequence(s)'' in the title. Until we know more abou
t the function of the inhibitory input to the inferior olive from the
cerebellar nuclei, which are motor structures, we have to keep open th
e possibility that the climbing fiber signals can be a combination of
sensory and motor signals.