Simulated transfer schemes using household data for Venezuela, Mexico
and Jamaica indicate that geographic targeting is a useful mechanism f
or transferring benefits to the poor. Poverty can be significantly red
uced when compared schemes with transfer schemes involving no targetin
g, such as general food subsidies. Of the various techniques used to i
dentify priority regions for a targeted program, outcomes proved to be
fairly similar. The level of geographic unit does, however, seem to h
ave a notable impact on targeting outcomes. In the case of Mexico, the
more narrowly defined the geographic region, the greater was the redu
ction in poverty. These findings have obvious implications for program
design.