The impact that predators have on benthic, macroinvertebrate prey dens
ity in streams is unclear. While some studies show a strong effect of
predators on prey density, others show little or no effect. Two factor
s appear to influence the detection of predator impact on prey density
in streams. First, many field studies have small sample sizes and thu
s might be unable to detect treatment effects. Second, streams contain
two broad classes of predators, invertebrates and vertebrates, which
might have different impacts on prey density for a variety of reasons,
including availability of refuge for prey and prey emigration respons
es to the two types of predators. In addition, predatory vertebrates h
ave more complex prey communities than predatory invertebrates; this c
omplexity might reduce the impact that predatory vertebrates have on p
rey because of indirect effects. I conducted a meta-analysis on the re
sults of field studies that manipulate predator density in enclosures
to determine (1) if predators have a significant impact on benthic pre
y density in streams, (2) if the impacts that predatory invertebrates
and vertebrates have differ, and (3) if predatory vertebrates have dif
ferent impacts on predatory prey versus herbivorous prey. The results
of the meta-analysis suggest that on average predators have a signific
ant negative effect on prey density, predatory invertebrates have a si
gnificantly stronger impact than predatory vertebrates, and predatory
vertebrates do not differ in their impact on predatory versus herbivor
ous invertebrate prey. Three methodological variables (mesh size of en
closures, size of enclosures, and experimental duration) were examined
to determine if cross correlations exist that may explain the differe
nces in impact between predatory invertebrates and vertebrates. No cor
relation exists between mesh size and predator impact. Over all predat
ors, no correlation exists between experimental duration and predator
impact; however, within predatory invertebrates a correlation does exi
st between these variables. Also, a correlation was found between encl
osure size and predator impact. This correlation potentially explains
the difference in impact between predatory invertebrates and predatory
vertebrates. Results of the meta-analysis suggest two important areas
for future research: (1) manipulate both types of predators within th
e same system, and (2) examine their impacts on the same spatial scale
.