Contemporary cognitive neuropsychology attempts to infer unobserved fe
atures of normal human cognition, or 'cognitive architecture', from ex
periments with normals and with brain-damaged subjects in whom certain
normal cognitive capacities are altered, diminished, or absent. Funda
mental methodological issues about the enterprise of cognitive neurops
ychology concern the characterization of methods by which features of
normal cognitive architecture can be identified from such data, the as
sumptions upon which the reliability of such methods are premised, and
the limits of such methods-even granting their assumptions-in resolvi
ng uncertainties about that architecture. With some idealization, the
question of the capacities of various experimental designs in cognitiv
e neuropsychology to uncover cognitive architecture can be reduced to
comparatively simple questions about the prior assumptions investigato
rs are willing to make. This paper presents some of simplest of those
reductions. 1 Introduction 2 Theories as functional diagrams and graph
s 3 Formalities 4 Discovery problems and success 5 Some examples 6 Res
ource/PDP models 7 Conclusion