A troublesome but generally ignored paradox characterizes contemporary
sociological explanations of crime causation. Although many sociologi
sts interpret crime as if it were pathological or aberrant and thus ''
abnormal'' behavior most simultaneously embrace Durkheim's famous dict
um of crime as ''normal'' behavior A review of Durkheim's theory of cr
ime causation reveals that it is burdened by several serious logical f
laws. And ironically, despite his reputation for propagating a purely
sociological explanation of crime, Durkheim resorts ultimately to indi
vidual characteristics, rather than social facts, in order to identify
the root causes of crime. Contemporary evolutionary game theory affor
ds an alternative explanation of the normalcy of much crime without su
ffering the deficiencies of the classical Durkheimian approach. The au
thors' evolutionary ecological-based theory explains the incidence of
''expropriative'' crime as a by-product of normal patterns of social o
rganization and processes of social interaction. Furthermore, this alt
ernative perspective successfully explains, within one theoretical fra
mework, the link between key macro- and microlevel forces responsible
for patterns of expropriative crime.