In 1890 Thomas Henry Huxley launched an extremely harsh attack against
Henry George. The basis for the attack has until now remained unclear
. The opening in 1959 of Charles Darwin's research journals, has led d
erivatively to reconsideration of Huxley's position as an advocate of
evolutionary biology and proponent of science and scientists in Britai
n, and thereby offers new perspective on the roots of the Huxley-Georg
e controversy. The reasons for the conflict are to be found in Huxley'
s attempt to attract British workers to acceptance of evolutionary sci
ence, and to market scientists to employers as defenders of order and
progress, who should be supported by the public and the public purse.
The challenge George made was to appeal for social reform and fairer t
reatment for workers through more traditional, non-science based appea
ls. Thus, George accepted the concept of natural order and religion as
valid. The heart of the science Huxley propounded had a Maltbusian be
at, but George, perhaps unknowingly, turned the primary argument of ev
olutionary science-Malthusian dynamics-against Huxley. George was not
only a threat to Huxley personally but also to the enormous efforts Hu
xley had invested in attempting to professionalize science through the
vehicle of having British workers accept the cosmic kaleidoscope and
concepts of biological man. George, holding the older human self-image
was triumphant in appealing to British workers since the message stre
ngthened the quest of British workers for a better life. Huxley's atte
mpt to portray science as the basis for a new morality failed in its c
ontest with the morally infused political economy advanced by George.