Da. Farber et S. Sherry, THE 200,000 CARDS OF YURASOV,DIMITRI - FURTHER REFLECTIONS ON SCHOLARSHIP AND TRUTH, Stanford law review, 46(3), 1994, pp. 647-662
Last April, Professors Daniel Farber and Suzanna Sherry published a cr
itique in these pages of the legal storytelling movement. Their legal
position has been the subject of several responses, including an essay
by Professor William Eskridge in this issue. In reply, Professors Far
ber and Sherry challenge their critics' reliance on postmodern views s
uch as social constructionism. Social constructionism, according to Fa
rber and Sherry, embraces forms of community that would be destructive
to the scholarly enterprise. It also risks conflating scholarship wit
h politics in ways harmful to both. More generally, Farber and Sherry
contend, postmodernism lacks any clear lessons for legal scholarship a
nd possesses at best a contingent connection with progressive change.