S. Gobel, MEDUSAS HEAD - PERSONAL RISKS FOR THE PSY CHOANALYST AS AN OBJECT OF EXTREME TRANSFERENCE CONSTELLATIONS, Forum der Psychoanalyse, 10(1), 1994, pp. 13-24
By means of an interpretation of the myth of Medusa some of the proces
ses connected to violence are clarified. Sexual and aggressive violenc
e destroys the inner dialogue and the interpersonal emotional relatedn
ess in the victims. It brings up mainly three phenomena, which are wit
h reference to trauma-research interpreted as mechanisms of defense: d
eanimation, mixed affect arousal and de-symbolization. These effects o
f violence can be summed up in a syndrome of ''non-relatedness'', i.e.
an inability of emotional interchange and dialogue. A solution of thi
s ''Medusa Complex'', as it might be called, is implicated in the myth
. Perseus can bring Medusa's horrifying petrification to an end by usi
ng 'mirror' and 'sword'. That means for the psychoanalyst working in t
his field, that he has to accept the reality of trauma (symbolized in
the myth by the mirror); he has to use the neutralizing effects of ref
lection and must show firm non-acceptance of the deteriorated emotiona
l and interpersonal relations (symbolized in the myth by the sword); o
nly than he can help the victims of violence. The violating effects an
d dangers of these processes are seen not only as phenomena of profess
ional countertransference but above all as affecting the psychoanalyst
in his personal experiencing; the emotional implications are discusse
d.