In this study, 13 children with severe hemophilia were given routine r
eplacement infusions of factor VIII or IX to treat arthropathy. The ch
ildren who had a mean age of 6.9 years (range 2.0-12.5) at initiation
of prophylaxis had experienced an average of 43 acute hemorrhages (ran
ge 8-127) in the year prior to prophylaxis, of which a mean of 24 (ran
ge 5-46) were into joints. Therapy was begun in five children, using f
actor VIII concentrate at 20 U/kg three times a week, and one boy rece
ived factor IX concentrate 40 U/kg twice a week. This dose schedule wa
s inadequate for three factor VIII-deficient boys and for the one fact
or IX-deficient boy. Two of three factor VIII-deficient boys responded
to an increase to 30 U/kg prior to the 3-day interval. The dose frequ
ency was increased to three times a week for the factor IX-deficient b
oy, but he continued to bleed and was taken to synovectomy. One of the
original five factor VIII-deficient boys plus seven other factor VIII
-deficient boys were begun on factor VIII 20 U/kg every other day; 3 b
oys ceased bleeding. Trough factor VIII levels were measured 24 hr aft
er an infusion in the five boys who continued to bleed. Factor VIII do
sage was adjusted to achieve a trough level of > 1%; 4 responded to an
increase in the dose of factor VIII; 1 had an adequate trough but, du
e to compliance issues, was taken to synovectomy. Serial clinical and
radiographic assessments determined stabilization of joint disease in
more than one-half of the boys. No child showed reversal of abnormal r
adiographic findings. Institution of aggressive factor VIII and IX con
centrate in children with established hemophilic arthropathy does not
reverse joint disease but may alter the clinical course of hemophilia.
Future studies to compare this intervention with primary prophylaxis
instituted prior to the onset of recurrent joint hemorrhage are warran
ted. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.