Screening is a way of detecting disease early in an asymptomatic popul
ation. For cancer screening to be effective, there not only must be a
test that will detect cancer earlier, but there also must be a treatme
nt that will result in an improved outcome. The strongest evidence for
screening benefit comes from randomized prospective trials with a dec
rease in mortality as the outcome. For women older than 69 years of ag
e, there is no direct scientific evidence that screening mammography w
ill decrease their mortality from breast cancer. If there is no direct
evidence (positive or negative), what can we say about any potential
benefit for older women? The Forum on Breast Cancer Screening in older
women (held in Sturbridge, Massachusetts, in 1990 and sponsored by th
e National Cancer Institute and the National Institute of Aging) syste
matically reviewed a number of issues that were considered to have an
indirect but positive impact on the benefit of screening mammography--
incidence (which rises dramatically with age), mortality (greater in w
omen older than 65), mammography detection (enhanced in breasts of old
er women), and elderly survival rates (the average women older than 65
lives long enough to benefit from screening). Unresolved issues were
the proper interval for screening (12 vs. 24 vs. 33 months) and the ex
tent to which clinical breast examination contributes to a decrease in
mortality. Clinical research in the form of a national trial is neede
d, because the recommendations to initiate or continue screening mammo
graphy in women older than 65 is based not on scientific evidence but
on opinion.