The importance of movement in texture perception by touch has long bee
n appreciated, but problematic issues related to the utilization of in
formation during active touch persist. How is the repeated demonstrati
on of active-passive equivalence in perceptual sensitivity to felt tex
ture to be interpreted? What does such equivalence imply about the sou
rce(s) of information used to make perceptual judgments of texture? Wh
at sort of perceptual subsystem is organized to recover texture by tou
ch? What is the role played by the action system in this recovery? The
seminal observations of David Katz and J.J. Gibson are recounted and
contemporary research is described. Several unresolved issues are outl
ined, as are several approaches by which the availability and utilizat
ion of information within this particular perceptual-action subsystem
can be empirically studied.