USING ELABORATIVE INTERROGATION TO FACILITATE ACQUISITION OF FACTUAL INFORMATION IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING SETTINGS - ONE GOOD STRATEGY DESERVES ANOTHER

Citation
B. Kahl et Ve. Woloshyn, USING ELABORATIVE INTERROGATION TO FACILITATE ACQUISITION OF FACTUAL INFORMATION IN COOPERATIVE LEARNING SETTINGS - ONE GOOD STRATEGY DESERVES ANOTHER, Applied cognitive psychology, 8(5), 1994, pp. 465-478
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental
ISSN journal
08884080
Volume
8
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
465 - 478
Database
ISI
SICI code
0888-4080(1994)8:5<465:UEITFA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
The primary purpose of this study was to determine whether providing 6 th-grade students with cooperative elaborative interrogation instructi on would facilitate learning relative to providing them with cooperati ve learning, elaborative interrogation or reading-for-understanding in structions. All students were presented with 36 factual statements abo ut six animals. Cooperative elaborative interrogation students were in structed to work collaboratively and use their prior knowledge to stat e why each fact is true. Cooperative learning students were told to wo rk collaboratively to learn target materials, while elaborative interr ogation students were instructed to generate answers to the why questi ons on their own. Reading-control students were also on their own and instructed to read the animal facts for understanding. For immediate f ree recall and immediate associative matching tests, students in the e xperimental conditions outperformed those in the control condition. Co operative elaborative interrogation and elaborative interrogation stud ents maintained this advantage on a 30-day follow-up associative match ing test, with elaborative interrogation students maintaining a signif icant advantage relative to reading controls on a 60-day associative m atching follow-up. (There was also a strong trend favouring the cooper ative elaborative interrogation condition on this 60-day measure.) The quality of the 'why' answer affected learning: Generating and listeni ng to scientifically correct answers that used relevant prior knowledg e to clarify target information was associated with better memory for facts than were other types of study responses. Students in this study learned the most when they were explicitly directed to activate relev ant prior knowledge that supports and clarifies new information-proces sing that occurs following either small-group or individual elaborativ e interrogation instruction.