In this article, past consumer research dealing with advertising image
s is analyzed and critiqued for its underlying assumption: that pictur
es are reflections of reality. The case against this assumption is pre
sented, and an alternative view, in which visuals are a convention-bas
ed symbolic system, is formulated. In this alternative view, pictures
must be cognitively processed, rather than absorbed peripherally or au
tomatically. The author argues that current conceptualizations of adve
rtising images are incommensurate with what ads are really like, and t
hat many images currently dismissed as affect laden or information dev
oid are, in fact, complex figurative arguments. A new theoretical fram
ework for the study of images is advanced in which advertising images
are a sophisticated form of visual rhetoric. The process of consumer r
esponse implied by the new framework differs radically from past conce
pts in many ways, but also suggests new ways to approach questions cur
rently open in the literature on the nature and processing of imagery.
A pluralistic program for studying advertising pictures as persuasion
is outlined.