D. Tousoulis et al., LEFT-VENTRICULAR FUNCTION AND CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE PROGRESSION EARLY AFTER CORONARY-BYPASS GRAFTING, The Annals of thoracic surgery, 58(3), 1994, pp. 857-863
To investigate the effects of coronary artery disease progression on l
eft ventricular function in patients who suffer angina early after cor
onary artery bypass grafting, we studied the progression of coronary s
tenoses, the occurrence of graft occlusions, and measured left ventric
ular ejection fraction (regional and global) in 34 consecutive patient
s who underwent repeat angiography 25.2 +/- 3.5 (standard error of the
mean) months postoperatively, from a total population of 550 patients
who underwent bypass grafting. Resting left ventricular function and
stenosis severity were assessed using a computerized, quantitative ana
lysis system. Coronary stenosis progression was defined as an increase
in the percentage of the stenotic occlusion by 30% or more, any incre
ase in lesion severity that resulted in total coronary artery occlusio
n, or the occurrence of a new stenosis that occluded the artery by 50%
or more. Group 1 comprised 21 patients with all grafts patent and gro
up 2 comprised 13 patients with one or more grafts occluded (20 of 34
grafts). Coronary artery disease progressed in all patients in group 1
, and this involved 22 of 54 (41%) grafted vessels and 3 of 15 (20%) n
ongrafted vessels (p < 0.05). Coronary artery disease progressed in 11
patients in group 2, involving 15 of 32 (47%) grafted vessels and 1 o
f 6 (17%) nongrafted vessels (p < 0.01). An increased collateral circu
lation was observed in both groups. The left ventricular ejection frac
tion remained unchanged in both groups (group 1, 0.60 +/- 0.03 versus
0.62 +/- 0.03; group 5 0.62 +/- 0.05 versus 0.62 +/- 0.04 before and a
fter bypass, respectively; p = not significant) and there was no diffe
rence between the groups. We conclude from our findings that, in patie
nts with angina that recurs within 5 years of the bypass procedure, le
ft ventricular function is preserved despite coronary artery disease p
rogression and graft occlusion. This is probably due to the developmen
t of a collateral circulation, albeit insufficient to prevent exercise
-induced myocardial ischemia.