P. Michetti et al., IMMUNIZATION OF BALB C MICE AGAINST HELICOBACTER-FELIS INFECTION WITHHELICOBACTER-PYLORI UREASE/, Gastroenterology, 107(4), 1994, pp. 1002-1011
Background/Aims: Because Helicobacter pylori is a potentially dangerou
s human pathogen, the protective potential of oral immunization with H
. pylori urease and its subunits was evaluated in an animal model. Met
hods: Mice were orally immunized with H. pylori sonicate, urease, or r
ecombinant enzymatically inactive urease subunits and then challenged
with Helicobacter felis. Control mice were sham-immunized. Results: H.
felis colonization was present 5 days after challenge in 9 of 10 sham
-immunized, 6 of 9 sonicate-immunized, and 3 of 10 urease-immunized an
imals (P = 0.031 vs. sham-immunized). Twelve days after challenge, ure
ase B-immunized mice had a weaker colonization than sham-immunized con
trols, whereas urease A had no effect. After 70 days, most urease A- a
nd urease B-immunized mice had cleared the colonization (10/17: P = 0.
0019; 16/20: P = 0.00002 vs. sham-immunized). In urease B-immunized an
imals, protection was often associated with corpus gastritis. Conclusi
ons: Oral immunization with H. pylori urease protects mice against H.
felis infection. Enzymatically inactive urease A and B subunits contai
n protective epitopes. It is unclear whether protection depends on the
development of a mononuclear inflammatory response in the gastric cor
pus. Our observations should encourage the development of a human vacc
ine.