RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. To assess the various functions of regular r
eview conferences between clinicians and radiologists, proceedings at
19 such meetings were audited. In particular, the authors attempted to
quantify their educational component. METHODS. The cases discussed du
ring each meeting were monitored, and the educational component was as
sessed. Changes in imaging strategy, diagnosis, and management were no
ted. The participants were questioned regarding their perceptions of s
uch meetings. RESULTS. Two hundred cases were presented at 19 meetings
(mean duration 44.8 minutes). Overall, 75 of the 200 cases (37.5%) we
re presented for routine purposes, 100 (50%) for radiologic assistance
, and 25 (12.5%) for general interest. More changes in diagnosis and m
anagement and a greater educational contribution occurred in those cas
es presented for radiologic assistance than in those presented out of
routine. Most participants considered that these meetings bestowed con
siderable benefit to their continuing medical education and to the man
agement of their patients. Discussion considered of educational value
developed in 88 of the 200 patients presented; this discussion require
d 61.7% of the total duration of these meetings. CONCLUSIONS. These co
nferences provide benefit to the patient, as well as serving an educat
ional role for the medical community. Discussion of imaging strategies
and the presentation of controversial and interesting cases should be
particularly encouraged.