PREVENTION OF NEONATAL INFECTIONS BY VAGINAL CHLORHEXIDINE DISINFECTION DURING LABOR

Citation
T. Henrichsen et al., PREVENTION OF NEONATAL INFECTIONS BY VAGINAL CHLORHEXIDINE DISINFECTION DURING LABOR, Acta paediatrica, 83(9), 1994, pp. 923-926
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Pediatrics
Journal title
ISSN journal
08035253
Volume
83
Issue
9
Year of publication
1994
Pages
923 - 926
Database
ISI
SICI code
0803-5253(1994)83:9<923:PONIBV>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Comparison of two different methods of vaginal disinfection was made w ith regard to prevention of neonatal infections. In method I, an antep artum vaginal douche with a chlorhexidine solution was used; method II involved the use of chlorfiexidine gluconate obstetrical gel during v aginal exploration. We studied 2853 normal deliveries from a total num ber of 3236 deliveries: 1467 deliveries were allocated randomly to rec eive a vaginal douche whereas 1386 underwent vaginal exploration using chlorhexidine gel. A total of 203 neonates were transferred to the ne onatal unit (120 males and 83 females): 101 belonged to the group wher e the mothers were subjected to method I, whereas in 102 method II had been used. Within 48 h postpartum 30 neonates from the method I group and 34 neonates from the method II group received systemic antibiotic s. There was a tendency towards a higher proportion of full-term neona tes with verified septicaemia in the method II group (6 versus 2), whe reas the numbers of probable infections were 8 versus 12. The correspo nding total numbers in preterm infants were 3 and 2, respectively. The se differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that th e use of chlorhexidine douche compared with vaginal exploration with c hlorhexidine gel provides no additional advantages.