Comparison of two different methods of vaginal disinfection was made w
ith regard to prevention of neonatal infections. In method I, an antep
artum vaginal douche with a chlorhexidine solution was used; method II
involved the use of chlorfiexidine gluconate obstetrical gel during v
aginal exploration. We studied 2853 normal deliveries from a total num
ber of 3236 deliveries: 1467 deliveries were allocated randomly to rec
eive a vaginal douche whereas 1386 underwent vaginal exploration using
chlorhexidine gel. A total of 203 neonates were transferred to the ne
onatal unit (120 males and 83 females): 101 belonged to the group wher
e the mothers were subjected to method I, whereas in 102 method II had
been used. Within 48 h postpartum 30 neonates from the method I group
and 34 neonates from the method II group received systemic antibiotic
s. There was a tendency towards a higher proportion of full-term neona
tes with verified septicaemia in the method II group (6 versus 2), whe
reas the numbers of probable infections were 8 versus 12. The correspo
nding total numbers in preterm infants were 3 and 2, respectively. The
se differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that th
e use of chlorhexidine douche compared with vaginal exploration with c
hlorhexidine gel provides no additional advantages.