A. Bremer et al., TOWARDS ATOMIC INTERPRETATION OF F-ACTIN FILAMENT 3-DIMENSIONAL RECONSTRUCTIONS, Journal of Molecular Biology, 242(5), 1994, pp. 683-700
We have recorded dark field images of negatively stained F-actin filam
ents polymerized with 2 mM MgCl2 and 50 mM KCl with a scanning transmi
ssion electron microscope and computed 3-D reconstructions using a hel
ical parameter search to optimize simultaneously the helical repeat le
ngth, the radial position of the filament axis, and the helical select
ion rule. The resulting optimized averaged filament 3-D reconstruction
at 2.5 nm resolution is remarkably similar to an atomic model of the
F-actin filament. By comparison, several structural features of the re
construction can be interpreted at the level of distinct secondary str
ucture elements, and predictions made by the atomic model could be ver
ified: for instance, the density connecting the two long-pitch helical
strands in our reconstruction co-localizes with an extended beta-hair
pin, the ''hydrophobic loop'' (i.e. residues 262 to 274), which accord
ing to the atomic model establishes the major intersubunit contact bet
ween the two long-pitch helical strands. The most pronounced structura
l variations among individual filament 3-D reconstructions were observ
ed in (1) the details of the intersubunit contact pattern between the
two long-pitch helical strands, and (2) the exact size and shape of su
bdomain 2 of the F-actin molecule, which appears rather flexible and e
asily deformed. In addition, we found that all phenotypes of F-actin f
ilament 3-D reconstructions that arise from small deviations from the
optimal helical parameters or from lowering the nominal resolution exh
ibited stronger intersubunit contacts between than along the two long-
pitch helical strands, a structural feature that has been emphasized f
or a number of F-actin filament 3-D reconstructions in the past. Since
this is clearly at variance with the relative strength of the intersu
bunit contacts as predicted by the atomic model, it may represent an a
rtifactual structural feature arising from low-resolution data or subo
ptimal helical data processing, and should therefore be interpreted wi
th caution in terms of indicating chemical, mechanical or conformation
al states of the F-actin filament.