Gk. Steinberg et al., CEREBRAL-DAMAGE CAUSED BY INTERRUPTED, REPEATED ARTERIAL-OCCLUSION VERSUS UNINTERRUPTED OCCLUSION IN A FOCAL ISCHEMIC MODEL, Journal of neurosurgery, 81(4), 1994, pp. 554-559
Temporary intracranial arterial occlusion is often utilized during the
surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Although numerous exper
imental studies have suggested that repetitive, brief periods of globa
l ischemia cause more severe cerebral injury than a similar single per
iod of global ischemia, this issue has not been extensively studied in
relation to focal ischemia. It remains controversial whether it is sa
fer to use brief periods of interrupted, temporary occlusion separated
by reperfusion periods, or a more prolonged, single temporary occlusi
on. This question is addressed in studies on a rabbit model of transie
nt, focal cerebral ischemia. Sixteen anesthetized rabbits underwent tr
ansorbital occlusion of the left internal carotid, middle cerebral, an
d anterior cerebral arteries, with one of two paradigms: uninterrupted
occlusion (1 hour of temporary occlusion followed by 5 hours of reper
fusion in eight rabbits), or interrupted occlusion (three separate 20-
minute periods of occlusion, with 10 minutes of reperfusion between oc
clusions, followed by 4 hours, 40 minutes of reperfusion in eight rabb
its). Histopathological evaluation for ischemic neuronal damage and ma
gnetic resonance imaging studies for ischemic edema were conducted 6 h
ours after the initial arterial occlusion. The animals in the interrup
ted, repeated occlusion group showed a 59% decrease in the area of cor
tical ischemic neuronal damage (mean +/- standard error of the mean 10
.0% +/- 1.7%) compared with the uninterrupted occlusion group (24.4% /- 5%, p = 0.016). There was no difference between the groups in the e
xtent of striatal ischemic damage or area of ischemic edema. These res
ults suggest that interrupted, repeated focal ischemia causes less cor
tical ischemic injury than uninterrupted transient ischemia of a simil
ar total duration. Although caution should be exercised in extrapolati
ng from these results to the clinical situation, they may have importa
nt implications for temporary arterial occlusion during intracranial s
urgery.