T. Tsuruta et al., COMPARISON OF PROXIMAL AND DISTAL ONE PORTAL ENTRY TECHNIQUES FOR ENDOSCOPIC CARPAL-TUNNEL RELEASE - A CADAVER STUDY, Journal of hand surgery. British volume, 19B(5), 1994, pp. 618-621
Reported complications of endoscopic carpal tunnel release have increa
sed as more surgeons use this technique to release the flexor retinacu
lum. We used a cadaver model to compare the results of endoscopic carp
al tunnel release through a one-portal distal (Group A, 15 specimens)
and a one-portal proximal (Group B, 15 specimens) entry site with a ne
w endoscopic technique. Our custom-made glass tube of three different
sizes (5, 7, and 9 mm in diameter) is designed to house an endoscope a
nd accommodate a meniscus knife for releasing the flexor retinaculum.
Complete release of the flexor retinaculum was obtained in all limbs i
n both groups. In Group A the one complication (7%) was loss of the co
tton tip from the cotton swab stick within the carpal tunnel. In Group
B, there was a single case of injury to the superficial palmar arch i
n one hand and breakage of a glass tube in another hand, for a total c
omplication rate of 13%. No other damage to anatomical structures was
noted.