SEX-DIFFERENCES IN NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTION IN NONPSYCHOTIC RELATIVES OF SCHIZOPHRENIC PROBANDS

Citation
Ws. Kremen et al., SEX-DIFFERENCES IN NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTION IN NONPSYCHOTIC RELATIVES OF SCHIZOPHRENIC PROBANDS, Psychiatry research, 66(2-3), 1997, pp. 131-144
Citations number
108
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,Psychiatry
Journal title
ISSN journal
01651781
Volume
66
Issue
2-3
Year of publication
1997
Pages
131 - 144
Database
ISI
SICI code
0165-1781(1997)66:2-3<131:SINFIN>2.0.ZU;2-7
Abstract
Some recent studies suggest that men with schizophrenia may have great er neuropsychological deficits than women. It is not known, however, w hether similar sex differences may be present in biological relatives of schizophrenic patients. We evaluated neuropsychological functioning of 54 relatives of schizophrenic patients and 72 normal volunteers. I t was hypothesized that, if sex differences were present, they would b e accounted for largely by deficits in male relatives. We were particu larly interested in three neuropsychological functions that we previou sly identified as putative neuropsychological vulnerability indicators for schizophrenia: (1) abstraction/executive function; (2) verbal mem ory; and (3) auditory attention. There were significant group X sex in teractions for verbal memory and motor function, and trends toward sig nificant interactions for auditory attention and mental control/encodi ng. However, with the exception of motor function, it was the female r elatives who accounted for most of the impairment. A speculative expla nation for the findings is that women may have a higher threshold than men for developing schizophrenia. If so, female relatives might be ab le to withstand greater impairments than men before developing psychot ic symptoms. Consequently, in a sample that was limited to non-psychot ic relatives - as in the present study - there could be over-represent ation of both less impaired men and more impaired women. Alternative e xplanations and limitations of the study are also discussed. (C) 1997 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.