Background: White cell filtration of red cell concentrates is often pe
rformed at the bedside, in the ward, with the filter inserted in the b
lood administration line. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ef
ficiency of this filtration method and compare it to filtration in the
blood bank. Study Design and Methods: One-day-old, buffy coat-reduced
, hard-packed red cell concentrates in saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol
solution were filtered through different filters designed for bedside
or laboratory use. With filters designed for bedside use, filtration
of red cells was performed under laboratory conditions at fast flow (1
0 min) or under bedside conditions at slow flow (2 hours). The remaini
ng white cells were counted microscopically. Filters designed for labo
ratory use were evaluated at fast flow, and the number of contaminatin
g white cells was counted by flow cytometry. Results: With bedside fil
ters, a significantly higher contamination of white cells was found in
the units filtered at slow flow than at fast flow, regardless of the
filter used. The number of units with >5 x 10(6) white cells was 52 (7
8%) of 67 filtered at slow flow compared to 11 (23%) of 47 at fast flo
w, all filters taken together. This difference in white cell contamina
tion was mainly due to an increase of polymorphonuclear cells in the r
ed cell concentrates filtered at slow flow. With filters designed for
laboratory use, 0 to 2 percent of units in = 1448) were contaminated w
ith >5 x 10(6) white cells. Conclusion: Bedside filtration for white c
ell reduction at slow flow is inefficient for 1-day-old, buffy coat-re
duced red cell concentrates.