Drawing on data from four national surveys conducted in Spain since 19
78, this article evaluates a theory of political legitimacy that incor
porates three elements. The first takes into account the fact that, in
instances of regime change, ordinary citizens can meaningfully compar
e democratic and antidemocratic political systems. The second element
considers the content of interregime comparison, in particular, standa
rds of economic growth and social equity. Third, the phenomenon of tru
st in private and public domains is brought into play for the purpose
of specifying a distinctively democratic type of political legitimacy.
Finally, the strengths and limitations of the model are discussed, wi
th special reference to its utility in situations where regime transit
ions are not involved, and where the focus is on mass as well as elite
politics.