A. Pollack et al., MUSCLE-INVASIVE BLADDER-CANCER TREATED WITH EXTERNAL-BEAM RADIOTHERAPY - PROGNOSTIC FACTORS, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 30(2), 1994, pp. 267-277
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: To determine the relationship of several potential prognostic
factors to the outcome measures of pelvic control, freedom from metas
tases, and overall survival for bladder cancer patients treated with d
efinitive external beam radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: The recor
ds of 135 patients treated with high-dose, planned continuous-course,
external beam radiotherapy for muscle-invasive transitional cell bladd
er cancer were reviewed. These patients were treated to an average tot
al dose of 6588 +/- 475 cGy with an average fractional dose of 207 +/-
18 cGy using megavoltage. Median potential follow-up for all patients
, including those who died, was 249 months. Results: The actuarial res
ults at 5 year were 31% pelvic control, 58% freedom from metastases, a
nd 26% overall survival. In the univariate analyses, several factors w
ere correlated with disease outcome including clinical stage, tumor mo
rphology, gross total transurethral resection (TURBT), findings at bim
anual exam after TURBT, clinical perivesical extension, age, and clini
cal complete response at first follow-up cystoscopy (Clinical-CR). A C
ox proportional hazards model revealed that only Clinical-CR was indep
endently predictive of pelvic control. In terms of freedom from metast
ases, only Clinical-CR and clinical stage were significantly associate
d with outcome in the multivariate analysis. When the multivariate ana
lysis was restricted to T2 and T3 tumors only, then clinical perivesic
al extension replaced stage as being associated with freedom from meta
stases. The only factors significantly related to overall survival in
the Cox proportional hazards model were Clinical-CR, age, and complete
TURBT; stage was of borderline significance when only pretreatment fa
ctors were considered. Conclusions: Clearly, the most important progno
stic factor was Clinical-CR. The pretreatment factors of stage, clinic
al perivesical extension, and gross total TURBT also correlated with o
utcome, but, to a lesser degree. For patients medically unfit for radi
cal cystectomy radiotherapy is a viable option, particularly for selec
ted patients. Patients with T4 tumors are poor candidates for definiti
ve radiotherapy and should be treated palliatively if they cannot tole
rate systemic therapy.