Pa. Hall et al., SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - COMPARISON OF INFUSIONS OF PHENYLEPHRINE AND EPHEDRINE, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 73(4), 1994, pp. 471-474
Maternal cardiovascular changes and acid-base status were in 29 women
undergoing lower Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. The patie
nts were allocated randomly to one of three groups to receive an i.v.
infusion of one of the following: ephedrine 1 mg min(-1) (group E1: n
= 10), ephedrine 2 mg min(-1) (group E2: n = 9), or phenylephrine 10 m
u g min(-1) (group P: n = 10). Invasive arterial pressure was monitore
d continuously and if hypotension occurred (defined as a 20% decrease
from baseline, taken after i.v. preload administration), bolus doses o
f either ephedrine (6 mg in groups E1 and E2) or phenylephrine (20 mu
g in group P) were given. Only four patients became hypotensive in gro
up E2, compared with eight patients in group E1 and nine patients in g
roup P. The total time that the patients remained hypotensive was grea
test in group P (P < 0.005), less in group E1 and least in group E2. N
eonatal Apgar scores and acid-base profiles were similar in all three
groups. In this study, an infusion of phenylephrine 10 mu g min(-1) wi
th bolus doses of 20 mu g was shown to be significantly less effective
in maintaining systolic arterial pressure within 20% limits of baseli
ne compared with an infusion of ephedrine 1 or 2 mg min(-1) with bolus
doses of 6 mg