SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - COMPARISON OF INFUSIONS OF PHENYLEPHRINE AND EPHEDRINE

Citation
Pa. Hall et al., SPINAL-ANESTHESIA FOR CESAREAN-SECTION - COMPARISON OF INFUSIONS OF PHENYLEPHRINE AND EPHEDRINE, British Journal of Anaesthesia, 73(4), 1994, pp. 471-474
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Anesthesiology
ISSN journal
00070912
Volume
73
Issue
4
Year of publication
1994
Pages
471 - 474
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0912(1994)73:4<471:SFC-CO>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Maternal cardiovascular changes and acid-base status were in 29 women undergoing lower Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. The patie nts were allocated randomly to one of three groups to receive an i.v. infusion of one of the following: ephedrine 1 mg min(-1) (group E1: n = 10), ephedrine 2 mg min(-1) (group E2: n = 9), or phenylephrine 10 m u g min(-1) (group P: n = 10). Invasive arterial pressure was monitore d continuously and if hypotension occurred (defined as a 20% decrease from baseline, taken after i.v. preload administration), bolus doses o f either ephedrine (6 mg in groups E1 and E2) or phenylephrine (20 mu g in group P) were given. Only four patients became hypotensive in gro up E2, compared with eight patients in group E1 and nine patients in g roup P. The total time that the patients remained hypotensive was grea test in group P (P < 0.005), less in group E1 and least in group E2. N eonatal Apgar scores and acid-base profiles were similar in all three groups. In this study, an infusion of phenylephrine 10 mu g min(-1) wi th bolus doses of 20 mu g was shown to be significantly less effective in maintaining systolic arterial pressure within 20% limits of baseli ne compared with an infusion of ephedrine 1 or 2 mg min(-1) with bolus doses of 6 mg