In this paper we use a simple Downsian spatial model to analyze the pr
operties of campaign contributions. We first consider campaign contrib
utions that are intended to inform voters of candidate positions. We s
how that it is difficult to construct arguments in a Downsian spatial
model for why some voters would choose to contribute to a candidate an
d the candidate would want to spend the money contributed to inform vo
ters of his position. We then define persuasive campaign expenditures
as those that are intended to convince an individual to vote for a can
didate regardless of the candidate's position on issues. In the presen
ce of persuasive campaign expenditures some voters have an incentive t
o contribute to one or both candidates, and the candidates have an inc
entive to spend the money. We show why the nature of persuasive campai
gn expenditures may explain both their growth in recent years and the
increasing advantage of incumbency.