Ov. Lipp et al., HUMAN BLINK STARTLE DURING AVERSIVE AND NONAVERSIVE PAVLOVIAN CONDITIONING, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes, 20(4), 1994, pp. 380-389
Potentiation of blink startle during aversive and nonaversive Pavlovia
n single-cue conditioning was assessed in human Ss. In Experiment 1 (N
= 89), the conditioning group received paired presentations of a visu
al conditioned stimulus (CS) and an unconditioned stimulus (US), where
as the control group was presented with a random sequence. The US was
an electric shock for half the Ss and a nonaversive reaction time task
for the other half. Electrodermal conditioning was evident regardless
of the nature of the US, but blink potentiation was found only in the
conditioning group that had been trained with the aversive US. These
results were replicated in Experiment 2 (N = 65), in which a nonaversi
ve US of increased motivational significance was used. Thus, only aver
sive conditioning seems to affect the affective valence of the CS, at
least as reflected by changes in a skeletal reflex.