P. Aglietti et al., A COMPARISON BETWEEN MEDIAL MENISCUS REPAIR, PARTIAL MENISCECTOMY, AND NORMAL MENISCUS IN ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTED KNEES, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (307), 1994, pp. 165-173
A clinical, radiographic, and scintigraphic comparative study was perf
ormed on 57 consecutive successful patellar tendon anterior cruciate l
igament reconstructions far chronic laxity. Patients were divided into
3 matched groups according to the medial meniscal treatment. Group A
included 18 patients with medial meniscal repairs; Group B, 19 patient
s with partial medial meniscectomies; and Group C, 20 patients with no
rmal menisci (controls). The average followup was 55 months. At clinic
al examination, patients in Group B had more activity-related pain tha
n those in Group C (p = 0.04). The anteroposterior weight-bearing view
s in extension showed more degenerative changes in the medial compartm
ent in Group B than in the other 2 groups (Group A versus B, p = 0.01;
Group C versus B, p < 0.001). Scintigraphy showed an increased uptake
in the operated knee as compared with the normal side (11%), but no d
ifferences among the 3 study groups. The patients with partial menisce
ctomies had more pain and degenerative radiographically evident change
s than the control group. Medial meniscal repair offers a better chanc
e than partial meniscectomy to preserve the articular cartilage of the
medial compartment. Bone homeostasis, as detected by bone scanning, r
emains slightly altered in successful reconstructions as compared with
the opposite normal side.