Mr. Costanzo et al., EFFECTS OF METHOTREXATE ON ACUTE REJECTION AND CARDIAC ALLOGRAFT VASCULOPATHY IN HEART-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation, 16(2), 1997, pp. 169-178
Citations number
28
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiac & Cardiovascular System",Transplantation,"Respiratory System
Background: In heart transplant recipients methotrexate has been shown
to reverse recurrent/persistent acute rejection refractory to intensi
fied conventional immunosuppression. This study sought to determine wh
ether methotrexate produces a sustained decline of heart allograft rej
ection rates and renders rejection rates of patients with a history of
recurrent/persistent rejection similar to those of heart transplant r
ecipients without such history. Methods: Rejection, infection, and car
diac allograft vasculopathy were compared in 35 patients treated with
methotrexate (12 +/- 9 mg/week for 34 +/- 54 weeks) and 236 patients n
ever given methotrexate. Because the mean time from transplantation to
initiation of methotrexate was 9.4 months, patients treated without m
ethotrexate were analyzed for events less than or equal to 9.4 versus
> 9.4 months after heart transplantation. Results: Demographics, perio
perative and maintenance immunosuppression, and postoperative follow-u
p time (58 +/- 32 vs 57 +/- 33 months) were similar in the two groups.
Rejection rates decreased in both groups but remained significantly h
igher in the patients treated with methotrexate after initiation of th
erapy than in the patients treated without methotrexate more than 9.4
months after transplantation (0.15 +/- 0.16 vs 0.06 +/- 0.12 episodes/
patient/month; p = 0.0014). Infection rates were higher in patients af
ter methotrexate initiation than in patients treated without methotrex
ate more than 9.4 months after heart transplantation (0.17 +/- 0.24 vs
0.06 +/- 0.13 episodes/patient/month; p = 0.015). At the end of the f
ollow-up period methotrexate- and non-methotrexate-treated groups did
not differ in the percentage of patients with angiographically detecta
ble cardiac allograft vasculopathy (17.1% and 21.2%, respectively) and
survival (71.4% and 64.0%, respectively). Conclusions: Even after rev
ersal of rejection by methotrexate, patients requiring methotrexate fo
r the treatment of persistent/recurrent rejection continued to have hi
gher rejection rates than patients not requiring methotrexate. In spir
e of persistently higher rejection rates, patients treated with methot
rexate did not have higher rates of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Th
is finding raises the question whether methotrexate provides a protect
ive influence on the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in
this high-risk group.