Jk. Davidson et Nb. Moore, MASTURBATION AND PREMARITAL SEXUAL INTERCOURSE AMONG COLLEGE-WOMEN - MAKING CHOICES FOR SEXUAL FULFILLMENT, Journal of sex & marital therapy, 20(3), 1994, pp. 178-199
Given the potential value of masturbation as an alternative to high-ri
sk sexual practices, there is a need to investigate factors surroundin
g this method of physiological sexual fulfillment. Therefore, this stu
dy examined the differences, if any, between women who have engaged in
masturbation only (MO), both masturbation and sexual intercourse (MSI
), and sexual intercourse only (SIO). An anonymous questionnaire was a
dministered to volunteer respondents enrolled at a Midwestern universi
ty, yielding a subsample of 777 never-married, heterosexual women. Gro
up comparisons indicated that MO Group women were most likely to feel
guilty about engaging in masturbation and petting, but least likely to
report either comfort with their sexuality or sexual satisfaction. MS
I Group women indicated that, while growing up, they were less attache
d to their mother and father figures, whom they rated as uncommunicati
ve. They also were more likely to have engaged in risk-related sexual
behaviors. SIO Group women were more likely to have used contraceptive
s at first sexual intercourse and to report fewer lifetime sex partner
s than MSI Group women. Since a substantial number of college women re
frain from engaging in masturbation, yet choose to have unprotected se
xual intercourse and multiple sex partners, and others engage in mastu
rbation but report experiencing guilt feelings regarding self-stimulat
ion, it is of crucial importance that the negative connotations of mas
turbation and its attendant impact on sexual satisfaction be addressed
by sexuality educators, clinicians, and researchers.