EFFECT OF VIDEO FRAME RATE ON SUBJECTS ABILITY TO SHADOW ONE OF 2 COMPETING VERBAL PASSAGES

Citation
M. Vitkovitch et P. Barber, EFFECT OF VIDEO FRAME RATE ON SUBJECTS ABILITY TO SHADOW ONE OF 2 COMPETING VERBAL PASSAGES, Journal of speech and hearing research, 37(5), 1994, pp. 1204-1210
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Language & Linguistics",Rehabilitation
ISSN journal
00224685
Volume
37
Issue
5
Year of publication
1994
Pages
1204 - 1210
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-4685(1994)37:5<1204:EOVFRO>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
In a study addressing future use of video-telephone systems, the abili ty of 52 young adults with normal hearing to shadow verbal passages wa s assessed when they could both hear and observe the speaker. This per formance was compared to performance in an audio-alone condition. The passages were presented against an irrelevant background message. Effe cts of varying the video frame rate (i.e., the rate at which frames we re sampled) were examined, using rates of 8.3, 12.5, 16.7, and 25 Hz. The presence of the visual image of the relevant speaker always improv ed performance when compared with a baseline audio-alone condition. Th e motion of the speaker's face may generally support the focusing of a ttention on the target message. However, effects of video frame rate w ere also apparent, suggesting that specific visual cues became availab le as the temporal resolution improved. When frame rates of 8.3 Hz and the maximum available rate of 25 Hz were compared, shadowing performa nce was significantly better across the subject group at the higher fr ame rate. The comparison of frame rates of 12.5 and 25 Hz did not show reliably improved performance across the whole subject group at 25 Hz , although a small number of subjects seemed to benefit. This suggests there may be some differences in the visual cues used by subjects and consequent differences in the way individuals perform under different frame rates. Performance at 16.7 and 25 Hz did not differ, and this i s consistent with previous research that tested people with hearing lo ss. A frame rate of 16.7 Hz may therefore be adequate for the transmis sion of facial images via a video communication link to a broad range of users; at the lower frame rates, the performance of users is likely to suffer.