M. Vitkovitch et P. Barber, EFFECT OF VIDEO FRAME RATE ON SUBJECTS ABILITY TO SHADOW ONE OF 2 COMPETING VERBAL PASSAGES, Journal of speech and hearing research, 37(5), 1994, pp. 1204-1210
In a study addressing future use of video-telephone systems, the abili
ty of 52 young adults with normal hearing to shadow verbal passages wa
s assessed when they could both hear and observe the speaker. This per
formance was compared to performance in an audio-alone condition. The
passages were presented against an irrelevant background message. Effe
cts of varying the video frame rate (i.e., the rate at which frames we
re sampled) were examined, using rates of 8.3, 12.5, 16.7, and 25 Hz.
The presence of the visual image of the relevant speaker always improv
ed performance when compared with a baseline audio-alone condition. Th
e motion of the speaker's face may generally support the focusing of a
ttention on the target message. However, effects of video frame rate w
ere also apparent, suggesting that specific visual cues became availab
le as the temporal resolution improved. When frame rates of 8.3 Hz and
the maximum available rate of 25 Hz were compared, shadowing performa
nce was significantly better across the subject group at the higher fr
ame rate. The comparison of frame rates of 12.5 and 25 Hz did not show
reliably improved performance across the whole subject group at 25 Hz
, although a small number of subjects seemed to benefit. This suggests
there may be some differences in the visual cues used by subjects and
consequent differences in the way individuals perform under different
frame rates. Performance at 16.7 and 25 Hz did not differ, and this i
s consistent with previous research that tested people with hearing lo
ss. A frame rate of 16.7 Hz may therefore be adequate for the transmis
sion of facial images via a video communication link to a broad range
of users; at the lower frame rates, the performance of users is likely
to suffer.