The practice of voir dire has a venerable history in the United States
. However, despite numerous historical and legal discussions of the to
pic, and the increased participation of social scientists in the proce
ss, few empirical studies have been conducted on what actually occurs
during voir dire. The lack of normative data is especially troublesome
in the face of recent attacks on the process itself and numerous prop
osals to drastically limit or even prohibit what many regard as an imp
ortant criminal justice safeguard-attorney-conducted voir dire in felo
ny trials. This exploratory study attempts to provide some insight int
o the nature and content of felony voir dire. Our results-based on dir
ect observation as well as juror interview responses-suggest that much
of the criticism and calls for drastic reform may be misplaced.