Hjm. Lemmens et al., PHARMACOKINETIC-PHARMACODYNAMIC MODELING IN DRUG DEVELOPMENT - APPLICATION TO THE INVESTIGATIONAL OPIOID TREFENTANIL, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 56(3), 1994, pp. 261-271
Objective: We determined the possible benefits of a new opioid, trefen
tanil, relative to fentanyl and alfentanil using high-resolution pharm
acokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling and computer simulations of clinic
al dosing scenarios. Methods: First, we determined in nine volunteers
the electroencephalographic (EEG) effects and the trefentanil infusion
rate that gave maximal EEG changes in 3 to 10 minutes. Then, in a cro
ssover fashion in five volunteers, we compared the pharmacokinetics an
d EEG pharmacodynamics of trefentanil with fentanyl and alfentanil. Fi
nally, we used computer simulations to predict offset of opioid effect
s of trefentanil, fentanyl, and alfentanil when given in different dos
ing schemes. Results: The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of t
refentanil was similar to alfentanil, except for a higher elimination
clearance. Trefentanil versus alfentanil pharmacokinetic parameters we
re as follows: Elimination clearance, 0.444 +/- 0.073 versus 0.184 +/-
0.031 L/min; steady-state distribution volume, 37 +/- 7 versus 23 +/-
3 L; and elimination half-life, 127 +/- 24 versus 114 +/- 19 minutes,
Trefentanil versus alfentanil pharmacodynamics were as follows: the e
quilibration half-time between EEG effect and arterial drug concentrat
ion, 1.2 +/- 0.5 versus 0.6 +/- 0.4 minutes; and the concentration res
ulting in 50% of maximal EEG effect, 429 +/- 313 versus 577 +/- 273 ng
/ml. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic profile of fentanyl was signi
ficantly different from trefentanil and alfentanil. Simulation of effe
ct compartment concentration decay curves after variable-length infusi
ons predicted more rapid recovery ti om trefentanil than from alfentan
il or fentanyl. Conclusion: We suggest that high-resolution pharmacoki
netic-pharmacodynamic studies and computer simulations of clinical dos
ing scenarios may have significant usefulness in appreciating differen
ces between new and established drugs in early phase I studies.