B. Stea et al., INTERSTITIAL IRRADIATION VERSUS INTERSTITIAL THERMORADIOTHERAPY FOR SUPRATENTORIAL MALIGNANT GLIOMAS - A COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL ANALYSIS, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 30(3), 1994, pp. 591-600
Citations number
41
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: To compare the survival of two groups of patients with suprat
entorial malignant gliomas who were treated on two sequential protocol
s with either interstitial thermoradiotherapy or with interstitial irr
adiation without hyperthermia. Methods and Materials: Between 1988-199
2, patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or glioblastoma multiforme wer
e treated at the University of Arizona on a Phase I/II protocol of int
erstitial thermoradiotherapy with ferromagnetic seeds. The treatment p
rotocol consisted of debulking surgery, a course of external beam radi
otherapy and hyperthermia given immediately before and after brachythe
rapy. The survival of patients so treated was compared with that of a
similar group of patients treated with interstitial brachytherapy alon
e at the Barrows Neurological Institute between 1982-1990. Results: Tw
enty-five patients with primary tumors treated at the time of initial
presentation with thermoradiotherapy were compared with a control grou
p of 37 patients treated with interstitial brachytherapy alone. All pr
imary patients were followed for a minimum of 34 months post implant.
Multivariate analysis based on proportional hazards models showed that
hyperthermia (p = 0.027), patient age (p less than or equal to 0.0000
1) and histology (anaplastic astrocytoma vs. glioblastoma multiforme,
p = 0.0017) were the only factors significantly associated with surviv
al in this data set. From the fitted model, the hazard of dying when t
reated with hyperthermia was .53 times (95% confidence intervals 0.29-
0.94) than that of the control group. In addition, we treated a small
group of patients with recurrent tumors (13 with brachytherapy alone,
and eight with thermoradiotherapy) and found no survival difference (p
= 0.62). Conclusion: Within the constraints of the selection factors
and the different treatment parameters used in these studies, we concl
ude that an interstitial thermoradiotherapy boost confers a statistica
lly significant survival benefit to patients with primary high grade g
liomas when compared to interstitial brachytherapy alone.