Dm. Brizel et al., PRETREATMENT OXYGENATION PROFILES OF HUMAN SOFT-TISSUE SARCOMAS, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 30(3), 1994, pp. 635-642
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Purpose: Tumor oxygenation is thought to influence the radiocurability
of many malignancies. Advances in polarographic electrode technology
have facilitated the in situ measurement of human tumor pO(2). The opt
imal method of defining a ''hypoxic'' tumor is not known. Characteriza
tion of intra-tumor and intertumor pO(2) heterogeneity could help with
this process. This study was performed to evaluate pretreatment tumor
oxygenation status and pO(2) heterogeneity in patients with soft tiss
ue sarcoma. Methods and Materials: Nine patients with soft tissue sarc
omas underwent pretreatment pO(2) measurements with the Eppendorf pO(2
) histograph. Two grossly distinct anatomic sites within each tumor we
re measured in all but one patient; these were localized under compute
rized tomography guidance to ensure that all measurements were obtaine
d from tumor tissue. Multiple probe tracks were studied at each site.
Measurements were performed in resting, awake patients. Results: A tot
al of 1588 pO(2) readings was obtained (mean = 176/patient). Measureme
nt path lengths ranged from 22-36 mm. The average hypoxic fraction (pO
(2) < 5 mm Hg) was 29% (range 0-76%). Arterial pO(2) was positively co
rrelated with mean and median tumor pO(2). Tumor hypoxic fraction incr
eased with increasing tumor volume. Linear pO(2) profiles and frequenc
y histograms provided similar estimates of the extent of hypoxia in in
dividual tumors. Marked variation in oxygenation existed both within a
nd between individual tumors. The intertumor variation was greater tha
n the intratumor variation. Conclusion: Radiobiologic hypoxia exists i
n human soft tissue sarcomas. The pO(2) variation within individual tu
mors is less than the variation between tumors. Further study is neces
sary to identify the best parameter for defining tumor hypoxia and to
discern the relationship between tumor pO(2) and treatment outcome.