Background: Increased splanchnic venous capacitance has been observed
during extensive thoracolumbar epidural anesthesia in rabbits, but the
mechanism is not clear. The present study examines the contributions
of intravascular pressure changes, catecholamine levels, neural input,
and direct effects of lidocaine to mesenteric venodilatation. Methods
: Epidural catheters were inserted in rabbits anesthetized with alpha-
chloralose. Vein diameter was measured by videomicrography from segmen
ts of ileum externalized in situ. Plasma epinephrine and norepinephrin
e levels were measured in animals receiving epidural blockade (0.4 ml/
kg lidocaine 1.5%, n = 5) and in control animals given intramuscular l
idocaine 15 mg/kg (n = 5). Intraluminal pressure was monitored during
the onset of epidural anesthesia (0.4 ml/kg lidocaine 1.0%, n = 9) by
a servo-null micropressure technique. The effect of inhibiting norepin
ephrine release from sympathetic nerves in the mesenteric veins was de
termined by using topical tetrodotoxin (n = 8) and by assessing the ef
fect of topical lidocaine (10 and 100 mu g/ml, n = 5) administered in
the solution bathing the mesentery. Results: Epidural injectate extend
ed from T2 to L5. Plasma epinephrine decreased 68.3 +/- 4.4% (mean +/-
SEM) with epidural anesthesia, and norepinephrine was lower after epi
dural block than after intramuscular lidocaine (1,868 +/- 290 pg/ml vs
. 3,049 +/- 712 pg/ml). Mesenteric vein pressure decreased 35.3 +/- 3.
5% and vein diameter increased 10.2 +/- 3.3% during epidural blockade.
Tetrodotoxin caused mesenteric venodilatation (7.6 +/- 2.0%) and prev
ented venodilatation by subsequent epidural lidocaine. Topical lidocai
ne 10 mu g/kg produced no change in vein diameter, but lidocaine 100 m
u g/ml increased it 3.5 +/- 1.3%. Conclusions: Splanchnic venodilatati
on during epidural anesthesia is an active process: a decrease in intr
avenous pressure concurrent with dilatation indicates that vein wall t
ension diminished. Significant dilatation with tetrodotoxin and lack o
f dilatation with subsequent epidural block point to a minor role for
changes in circulating catecholamines. A direct effect of lidocaine do
es not contribute to splanchnic venodilatation except when circulating
lidocaine concentrations reach very high levels.