S. Hillerup et al., REPAIR OF THE LINGUAL NERVE AFTE PIATROGENIC INJURY - A FOLLOW-UP-STUDY OF RETURN OF SENSATION AND TASTE, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery, 52(10), 1994, pp. 1028-1031
Purpose: To evaluate the return of sensation and taste after surgical
repair of the lingual nerve in patients who had experienced lingual ne
rve sectioning.Patients and Methods: Average follow-up was 3.7 years w
ith a range of 1.1 to 4.6 yrs. The patients' assessment of tongue sens
ation and taste was registered. Clinical testing for sensibility inclu
ded light touch, prick, sharp/dull discrimination, heat (45-degrees-C)
, cold (0-degree-C), anterior/posterior localization of touch, percept
ion of direction of touch movement, and two-point discrimination. The
sense of taste was tested with sweet (saccharose 5%), sour (citric aci
d 5%), salt (saline 5%), and bitter (chininhydro-chloride 0.5%). Resul
ts: Three patients rated their tongue sensation on the affected side a
s normal, another three scored subnormal, and one felt no sensibility.
Likewise, four patients thought that their sense of taste was normal,
two were undecided, and one felt no sense of taste on the affected si
de. The ability to differentiate the quality of taste on the operated
side of the tongue was validated in four of 24 tests. Conversely, on t
he healthy side of the tongue, two of 24 tests proved negative for tas
te perception. Conclusion: There was a notable difference in the patie
nts' assessment of normality of tongue sensation versus the result of
neurological testing. Likewise, there was a remarkable difference betw
een the patients' subjective impression of gustatory capability and th
eir ability to diagnose the quality of taste on testing.