This article is a critique of the word 'user' as a description of peop
le in the person-environment relationship. By calling the person a use
r, researchers and designers place themselves inside a utilitarian wor
ld view which sees everything and ultimately everyone as simply a reso
urce to be exploited. At first intended by environmental psychologists
to refute the idea of the person as a passive stimulus recipient, the
word user has come to stand for a complicated grouping of attributes
which have been added to the user while ignoring or forgetting its lim
ited definition. The field of environmental psychology is challenged t
o rethink the naming of people as users and to create a term which bet
ter describes the person-environment relationship.