BICAVAL VERSUS ATRIAL ANASTOMOSES IN CARDIAC TRANSPLANTATION - RIGHT ATRIAL DIMENSION AND TRICUSPID-VALVE FUNCTION AT REST AND DURING EXERCISE UP TO 36 MONTHS AFTER TRANSPLANTATION
Hh. Sievers et al., BICAVAL VERSUS ATRIAL ANASTOMOSES IN CARDIAC TRANSPLANTATION - RIGHT ATRIAL DIMENSION AND TRICUSPID-VALVE FUNCTION AT REST AND DURING EXERCISE UP TO 36 MONTHS AFTER TRANSPLANTATION, Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 108(4), 1994, pp. 780-784
Conventional cardiac transplantation with atrial anastomoses alters at
rial integrity, geometry, and possibly function. Theoretically, this m
ay also contribute to the development of tricuspid insufficiency that
is frequently observed after the operation. Thus more anatomic transpl
antation techniques using bicaval anastomoses were recently introduced
into clinical practice. Knowledge of their efficacy, however, is scar
ce. Therefore right atrial size and tricuspid valve function were comp
ared in patients with bicaval (group A) and standard atrial (group B)
anastomoses in a randomized, prospective study. The results of this ec
hocardiographic study at rest and exercise in 18 patients (bicaval n =
8; atrial 10) on the average 28 months after transplantation are pres
ented. The right atrial dimension was comparable between group A patie
nts and control subjects and larger in group B patients (p < 0.05). Th
e incidence of tricuspid regurgitation was not different between the t
wo groups at rest, but it was at exercise (50 watts of workload) (p <
0.05). This study suggests that up to 36 months after cardiac transpla
ntation the technique of bicaval in contrast to atrial anastomoses pre
serves right atrial size and reduces tricuspid regurgitation during ex
ercise. Whether this leads to improved hemodynamics and increased exer
cise capacity remains to be evaluated in a larger series of patients.