INTERPRETING HIV SERODIAGNOSTIC TEST-RESULTS IN THE 1990S - SOCIAL RISKS OF HIV VACCINE STUDIES IN UNINFECTED VOLUNTEERS

Citation
Rb. Belshe et al., INTERPRETING HIV SERODIAGNOSTIC TEST-RESULTS IN THE 1990S - SOCIAL RISKS OF HIV VACCINE STUDIES IN UNINFECTED VOLUNTEERS, Annals of internal medicine, 121(8), 1994, pp. 584
Citations number
13
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
00034819
Volume
121
Issue
8
Year of publication
1994
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4819(1994)121:8<584:IHSTIT>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the influence of a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine given to uninfected volunteers on the interpretation of serodiagnostic HIV test results. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: 5 AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Units funded by the National Instit ute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Participants: The first 266 he althy adult volunteers (aged 18 to 60 years) who did not have HIV infe ction and whose history suggested that they were at low risk for acqui ring HIV infection. Measurements: HIV antibody was measured by enzyme- linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot test, the results of which were interpreted on the basis of four different published cri teria. Results: At some time during the first 12 months of the vaccine studies, 68% of volunteers were positive for HIV antibodies by ELISA. Depending on criteria used to interpret Western blot test results, 0% to 44% of volunteers had positive results that might have caused them to be incorrectly labeled as HIV infected. Conclusions: Significant s ocial risks to volunteers participating in HIV vaccine studies were id entified. Persons interpreting HIV serodiagnostic test results must co nsider that an HIV vaccine can cause a positive result in persons who are not infected.