Rb. Belshe et al., INTERPRETING HIV SERODIAGNOSTIC TEST-RESULTS IN THE 1990S - SOCIAL RISKS OF HIV VACCINE STUDIES IN UNINFECTED VOLUNTEERS, Annals of internal medicine, 121(8), 1994, pp. 584
Objective: To evaluate the influence of a human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV) vaccine given to uninfected volunteers on the interpretation of
serodiagnostic HIV test results. Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: 5 AIDS Vaccine Evaluation Units funded by the National Instit
ute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Participants: The first 266 he
althy adult volunteers (aged 18 to 60 years) who did not have HIV infe
ction and whose history suggested that they were at low risk for acqui
ring HIV infection. Measurements: HIV antibody was measured by enzyme-
linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Western blot test, the results
of which were interpreted on the basis of four different published cri
teria. Results: At some time during the first 12 months of the vaccine
studies, 68% of volunteers were positive for HIV antibodies by ELISA.
Depending on criteria used to interpret Western blot test results, 0%
to 44% of volunteers had positive results that might have caused them
to be incorrectly labeled as HIV infected. Conclusions: Significant s
ocial risks to volunteers participating in HIV vaccine studies were id
entified. Persons interpreting HIV serodiagnostic test results must co
nsider that an HIV vaccine can cause a positive result in persons who
are not infected.