Rf. Vantoor et Rp. Littlejohn, EVALUATION OF HIVE MANAGEMENT-TECHNIQUES IN PRODUCTION OF ROYAL JELLYBY HONEY-BEES (APIS-MELLIFERA) IN NEW-ZEALAND, Journal of Apicultural Research, 33(3), 1994, pp. 160-166
Two hive designs and two harvesting methods were evaluated in Otago, N
ew Zealand, for their effect on yields and quality of royal jelly, and
ease of management. Royal jelly yields from a queenright hive design,
in which a queen excluder partially covered with a hardboard division
confined the queen to the bottom brood chamber and away from the quee
n cells in the middle box where royal jelly was secreted, were similar
to those obtained from a queenless hive design in which the queen was
removed to a nucleus box. This was despite the bees clustering around
the queen cells in the queenright hive having smaller hypopharyngeal
glands than those in the queenless starter hive. The queenright design
is recommended because of its simplicity and ease of conversion in al
ternating between honey and royal jelly production. Harvesting 66 h af
ter grafting larvae resulted in similar yields to harvesting at 72 h a
nd 78 h, indicating that beekeepers can harvest at any time on the thi
rd day without affecting production. A technique which used two harves
ts per graft is not recommended. The chemical components of royal jell
y within certain quality standards were not affected by the treatments
. Royal jelly production suppressed honey yields by 51%.