The performance of the Hologic QDR-2000 DXA osteoden-sitometer was cri
tically evaluated at four centers, using at all four centers one bone
equivalent humanoid spine phantom supplied by the manufacturer. Result
s were compared with results from Hologic QDR-1000/W using that phanto
m tested at the same centers. It appears that the concept of fan-beam
scanning-as used in the QDR-2000: a fan-beam, a linear array detector
above the phantom, and an x-ray tube located rather close to the spine
below the phantom-creates problems due to the magnification effect of
the fan beam. The effect of decreasing the distance between the ''ver
tebrae''' of the phantom and the couch are: bone mineral content (BMC)
increases by 2.8% per cm, projected area (Area) by 2.8% per cm, and b
one mineral density (BMD) is unchanged. When QDR-1000/W is upgraded to
QDR-2000, BMD is relatively constant, but there are shifts of BMC and
Area which are partly due to the magnification effect of the fan-beam
. Replacement of a QDR-1000/W with a QDR-2000 can invalidate longitudi
nal measurements, even for BMD, unless the proportionality factors of
the QDR-2000 are checked and, if necessary, changed. This is true for
switching from QDR-1000/W to pencil-beam mode of QDR-2000 or to fan-be
am mode of QDR-2000. Even with pencil-beam mode, the long-term precisi
on error with phantoms is higher for QDR-2000 than for QDR-1000/W (for
BMD, 0.47% versus 0.35%).