Switching from the Hologic QDR-1000/W to the QDR-2000 DXA densitometer
was critically evaluated with regard to cross-calibration and dosimet
ry. Studies with bone equivalent humanoid spine phantoms and patient s
tudies were done. Fan-beam scanning with the QDR-2000 is problematic b
ecause of magnification. Mean phantom bone mineral content (BMC) and b
one mineral density (BMD) were moderately but significantly different.
Biological variation disguised differences between the two devices in
humans, but significant differences were revealed when individual dat
a were analyzed. Longitudinal assessments of BMC and BMD, initiated wi
th QDR-1000/W and continued with the QDR-2000, should employ single-be
am mode only and not fan-beam mode-but even if that is done, significa
nt errors can be introduced. The new QDR-2000 should be properly cross
-calibrated with the original densitometer, and one should make sure t
hat the same software, phantom, and type of collimator are used. The r
adiation dose is substantially higher with QDR-2000 (fan-beam and high
-resolution array mode) than with QDR-1000/W (pencil-beam mode) and QD
R-2000 (pencil beam mode), and higher than claimed by the manufacturer
. The typical radiation dose given by the manufacturer was half the ac
tual radiation dose measured (e.g., for fan beam scan 62 mu Sv versus
33 mu Sv). High-resolution array mode does not improve precision, but
augments the radiation dose to the patient.