MACROAGGREGATION OF PLATELETS IN PLASMA, AS DISTINCT FROM MICROAGGREGATION IN WHOLE-BLOOD (AND PLASMA), AS DETERMINED USING OPTICAL AGGREGOMETRY AND PLATELET COUNTING RESPECTIVELY, IS SPECIFICALLY IMPAIRED FOLLOWING CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS IN MAN
Vc. Menys et al., MACROAGGREGATION OF PLATELETS IN PLASMA, AS DISTINCT FROM MICROAGGREGATION IN WHOLE-BLOOD (AND PLASMA), AS DETERMINED USING OPTICAL AGGREGOMETRY AND PLATELET COUNTING RESPECTIVELY, IS SPECIFICALLY IMPAIRED FOLLOWING CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS IN MAN, Thrombosis and haemostasis, 72(4), 1994, pp. 511-518
We determined changes in platelet aggregability following cardiopulmon
ary bypass, using optical aggregometry to assess macroaggregation in p
latelet-rich plasma (PRP), and platelet counting to assess microaggreg
ation both in whole blood and PRP. Hirudin was used as the anticoagula
nt to maintain normocalcaemia. Microaggregation (%, median and interqu
artile range) in blood stirred with collagen (0.6 mu g/ml) was only ma
rginally impaired following bypass (91 [88, 93] at 10 min postbypass v
95 (99, 96] prebypass; n = 22), whereas macroaggregation (amplitude o
f response; cm) in PRP stirred with collagen (1.0 mu g/ml) was markedl
y impaired (9.5 [8.0, 10.8], n = 41 v 13.4 [12.7, 14.3], n = 10; p <0.
0001). However, in PRP, despite impairment of macroaggregation (9.1 [8
.5, 10.1], n = 12), microaggregation was near-maximal (93 [91, 94]), a
s in whole blood stirred with collagen. In contrast, in aspirin-treate
d patients (n = 14), both collagen-induced microaggregation in whole b
lood (49 [47, 52]) and macroaggregation in PRP (5.1 [3.8, 6.6]) were m
ore markedly impaired, compared with control (both p <0.001). Similarl
y, in PRP, macroaggregation with ristocetin (1.5 mg/ml) was also impai
red following bypass (9.4 [7.2, 10.7], n = 38 v 12.4 [10.0, 13.4]; p <
0.0002, n = 20), but as found with collagen, despite impairment of mac
roaggregation (7.2 [3.5, 10.9], n = 12), microaggregation was again ne
ar-maximal(96 [93, 97]). The response to ristocetin was more markedly
impared after bypass in succinylated gelatin (Gelo-fusine) treated pat
ients (5.6 [2.8, 8.6], n = 17; p <0.005 v control), whereas the respon
se to collagen was little different (9.3 v 9.5). In contrast to findin
gs with collagen in aspirin-treated patients, the response to ristocet
in was little different to that in controls (8.0 v 8.3). Impairment of
macroaggregation with collagen or ristocetin did not correlate with t
he duration of bypass or the platelet count, indicating that haemodilu
tion is not a contributory factor. In conclusion: (1) Macroaggregation
in PRP, as determined using optical aggregometry, is specifically imp
aired following bypass, and this probably reflects impairment of the b
uild-up of small aggregates into larger aggregates. (2) Impairment of
aggregate growth and consolidation could contribute to the haemostatic
defect following cardiac surgery.