Since the 1970s, a major shift in forestry development and management
has occurred, with the introduction of 'participatory approaches' to f
orestry use and management. The central idea of these new initiatives,
commonly launched under the umbrella of the term 'Social Forestry' (S
F), has been 'people's participation' in the regeneration and manageme
nt of forest. Protagonists claim that SF has opened a new vista for po
pular involvement in forestry activities, which was hitherto treated a
s a monopoly of the government technocrats. By deploying a conceptual
framework, this paper probes into the performance of Social Forestry a
s a participative strategy in the context of South Asia. It concludes
that, albeit the widespread popularity and advocacy, the role of Socia
l Forestry in ensuring participation and in empowering the local popul
ace has been insignificant and marginal. Participation in Social Fores
try, in the present form, is yet another style of bureaucratic manipul
ation, where people are 'invited' to 'act' within the strict limits an
d guidance of central authority.